Jump to content

NickIst

Approved Members
  • Posts

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Gallery

Downloads

Poweramp Knowledge Base

База знаний Poweramp

Poweramp知识库

Poweramp Equalizer Knowledge Base

База знаний Poweramp Equalizer

Store

Events

Ideas

Posts posted by NickIst

  1. On 12/20/2023 at 9:26 PM, andrewilley said:

    The separated versions failed to split only for Composer, and it also failed completely for Genre (which seems to have been encoded in a different manner in the file structure).

    In my use-case scenario, I can't reproduce bug with genres as my desktop software player's (MusicBee) tagging tools, use ony one string for genres. Regarding composer it has two type of fields: display composer and composer. By the way MusicBee says that m4a files use MPEG tags. 
    Updated images

     

     

    Снимок экрана 2023-12-22 004241.png

    Снимок экрана 2023-12-22 004328 1.png

  2. @andrewilley  Hello Andre! Unfortunatel, I ja e to reopen this thread. I have a problem or maybe a lack of knowledge with multiple composer tags. In current PA version 977, multiple tags version work fine with tags for flac files. But the same files converted into AAC format, with the same tagging as in flac files (Display composer= A composer; B composer; C composer and three separate entries COMPOSER) are read by the PA like a single string:  A composer B composer C composer. In other words PA ignores ; as separator in m4a files, despite the relevant options chosen in the settings.

    Attached screenshots with the same track but in different formats.

    I'm not sure whether it's a bug or limitations set by AAC format itself. Just want to know whether it can be solved or maybe I should regard using Vorbis format instead 

    Screenshot_20231220_054126_Poweramp.jpg

    Screenshot_20231220_054108_Poweramp.jpg

  3. I have a problem with the composers tag splitting. Despite the tags being splitted, PA stills unifies them under one string. Yo can see it on the screenshots below.

    Another thing I'm quering about is the artists tags. As far as I've got it, currently performer or guest artists tags (in Vorbis) are not supported?

    Screenshot_20210414-231038_Poweramp.jpg

    Screenshot_20210414-231024_Poweramp.jpg

  4. 8 hours ago, Starfly said:

    The S10 does have a built-in UHQ upscaler, which upsamples audio to an unspecified sample rate.

    Another useful info. According to the findings from the post below, it's better to turn off bit/banwidth mode and to use only bit mode or to turn the UHQ completely

    https://www.head-fi.org/threads/analyzing-samsung-uhq-upscaler-with-measurements-on-galaxy-note-8-exynos.873550/

  5. 4 hours ago, Starfly said:

    Now whenever a sample rate is picked every file plays at that rate, which often means that a 44.1khz file is upsampled, requiring more processing power and draining the battery more quickly

    My advice will be to use 48Khz or divisible rates, as Samsungs and as far as I heard majority of smartphones has only one oscillator which works with 48 Khz and it's better to upscale a bit tracks with more widespread 44.1 Khz.

  6. If we're speaking about people's hearing it's a very subjective field. Although I should admit that defined numbers or measures won't bring us much truth. We still listen to music with ears. From my experience I can say that if we're talking about a decent home audio system mp3 and FLAC can be relatively easy distinguished, also I did some test in the car with mp3 and aac, but it's another story.

    3 hours ago, w3wilkes said:

    For lossless (CD and beyond ripped to FLAC) I think if you use the same master and everything else is equal there would be no difference

    Yes, from the point of view of human senses it'd not be. For me Hi-Res can be just a gurantee to our inernal paranoid perfectionist.

    P.S. Mainly I download music so I don't pay for it.

  7. On 2/3/2019 at 1:04 AM, w3wilkes said:

    Any older music that's recorded on analog equipment will never be Hi-Res.

    Well that's a very dubious argument, from my point of view of course. If we are talking about old music and lossy/lossless format of course it'd better to have a lossless variant, because lossy formats still cut off a lot of information and you can't say for sure what is cut off. I heard the same opinion that it's wise to store the old music in the lossy formats, because "lossy format for lo-fi", however i consider the opposite, firstly as i mentioned before it's better to preserve the original source (tape or vinyl) in digital format with the help of lossless which gives more headroom or guarantee that nothing will be lost. Lossy can't assure that, because it's not his aim. Secondly it's an off topic but I store everything in FLAC, but listen in lossy for the sake of convenience, and because of that I can change lossy formats easily with converting them. 

    Finally what I'm implying (that's why I've written alll the above) is that even Hi-res (16+/44.1+) can give some advancement: but, Firstly it'd rather be dependent upon the source, music, remaster or original (the issue with harshness) etc. And secondly it's likely that the advancement will be inaudible in most cases due to hearing or hardware limitations. 

    P.S. harshness can be sometimes related not to Hi-Res, lossless issue but to equipment and production of the music.

  8. 51 minutes ago, overdose said:

    the second one is more like a ''pure output''. 

    Note that if you're using something like DSP manager or Viper4android, like Nicklst said, it will bypass it. 

    I did a lot of tuning with ATHM50 headphone and viper4droid, with a nice convolver driver, and subjectively, I like more the sound from viper4droid, even if my phone is compatible with HD output and I run FLAC files.  

    Viper4droid is a great tool for tuning, the new PA took at least one feature - output bypassing of the Android mixer. But generally yes, viper can sound better at least because it proposes a lot of profile for headphones and some other options for tuning which it seems the PA doesn't have.

  9. 15 minutes ago, JakeOrth said:

    But sound quality?

    The sound quality is better because the second one bypasses the Android audiomixer which can degrade the output quality and can cause large latency. Sorry I'm not a dev or something like that. The only source I found was https://casediletanta.blogspot.com/2018/10/Poweramp-v3-803.html but it's in Russian and devoted to the older build (and it has some unexplained tweaks). So it's better to ask someone more competent.

×
×
  • Create New...