Amirhamdy45

Although i really like the new lyrics API because of the new support for .lrc the timed lyrics extension but i do agree with you that 6 months is a long time . But i think the developer is more focused quality rather than quantity . It's really quite unfortunate that he is working alone and i hope i could be of any help but i am mainly a web developer and although i have some experience in programming and frameworks , i lack knowledge of audio Programming and android development . But i hope max will consider hiring new people even if it previously didn't work out i believe that this is the only path forward if he wants to reach a new milestone with this app and also building and integrating multilple teams in the future might add new sources of income if some teams were assigned different projects other than Poweramp and i really do get that its quite hard to work with people when you spent 15 years professionally coding but i also believe success requires some compromise. For starters he needs to search in the criteria of professional android developers and this takts alot of interviews and can canidate filtering to there but he will eventually get there

None because its not my project and the only motivation for me as a developer to do something for someone else would be money unless i have a personal interest on the subject matter , usually clients pay for an extra 6 months or more after the website is said to deliver what it promised for maintenance and stability updates but that is in the case of a freelancing one time job but for me personally i work full time so me and my team are expected to add new features that matches the business and if i have time i might work on some side projects . In the case of Poweramp it was actually a little of a surprise to me to learn that there is only one developer behind it all and since the business of Poweramp is not subscription based i have to guess the developer have some real passion for what he do and i bet that can't be the source of income that he relies on mainly but it is quite complicated because music players in general are not subscription based unless it is a streaming service so most companies that release these types of products usually have other products along with it and a development team

This a ton load of work for one developer to carry on , so in this case its quite understandable , is he planning to expand ? Or maybe take volunteers ?

Any development team in the world must have a roadmap that leads to a vision that they want to achieve somehow and by saying "The 6 items you have called out certainly don't change the performance of the app as it has ever been advertised." you are actually proving that your goal is just to make the app as advertised and any other new side features are just addons that users might or might not get to see . I'm a web developer for example and we never really call a website or a web app finished unless the company is facing real financial problems and can't afford to pay us for what we do , there is no finish product in the digital world you are not selling swiss chocolate . I also have an objection on the feature voting system , it seems that even the most requested features get max around 20 to 70 votes which is really super low considering the users of the app , my suggestion would be to make the voting system cross plaform . You have a subreddit that has many people in it why don't you post votes there to? Or maybe imbed the voting system into the app insuring that each user will see the vote even if he never heard of the forum because these numbers are a joke for real

I don't have links as of right now but sure you will find those in the feature requests category here is some of the unaddressed feature requests: 1- A to B repeat playback 2-Support BPM (Beats Per Minute) tag 3-Allow speed changing without pitch correctio or in other words add a pitch effect 4-Smart Playlist 5-Playback of users' cloud-stored content 6-more shuffle options customizations

I assume you are refering to a beta version which i didn't know existed , the last official app update in google play is 4 september of this year , here is some of the unaddressed feature requests: 1- A to B repeat playback 2-Support BPM (Beats Per Minute) tag 3-Allow speed changing without pitch correctio or in other words add a pitch effect 4-Smart Playlist 5-Playback of users' cloud-stored content 6-more shuffle options customizations

Hello Poweramp Community, This post seeks to express a collective sentiment of concern and frustration that i think many of us share regarding the app's development trajectory. Over time, our forum conversations have been punctuated by feature requests, each an eager note in a long list of user expectations. Unfortunately, these requests have lingered unanswered, creating a sense of longing for the anticipated harmonies of updates. Months have passed since the last app update, leaving us in a state of uncertainty. The developers' silence on their current projects has left us in the dark, craving a glimpse into the future of Poweramp. While the app remains functional, the absence of fresh features has led to the perception of stagnation. The community's desire for innovation and excitement seems is now shifted to silence and is met with a static hum of the familiar. Acknowledging disappointment doesn't diminish the app's strengths. Poweramp has been a reliable companion, and its existing features showcase a commitment to quality. However, the frustration stems from unmet expectations and a longing for continued evolution. In navigating these quiet echoes, i invite the developers to join us in crafting a harmonious future for Poweramp. Let this post be a gentle plea for acknowledgment, transparency, and a shared commitment to the app's continued evolution. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and insights!

@maxmp

@andrewilley

this problem is only on a specific Bluetooth device hi there i have been using Poweramp for over a year with dvc enabled and i heard that this improves sound and increases Poweramp control over audio hardware but i have a problem with this specific Bluetooth speaker (jbl flip 4 ) where sound gets very weird as soon as i enable dvc how wierd? 1-sound gets drastically low and I'm not talking about a small change 20 % with absolute volume sounds louder than 62% with dvc how come? 2-the sound quality itself is wierd and the bass release is very short than usual like its as if the speaker is underwater with that bass 3-the highs are a little distorted and unnatural , mids and highs in general are very flat with dvc enabled So yeah dvc seems to be causing alot of audio problems with my jbl flip 4 however it sounds completely normal on my samsung buds pro which is also a Bluetooth iem by the way My settings: 1-equalizer is disabled 2-preamp is at 0 db No external sound effects are enabled 3-i disabled absolute volume from android developer settings as it was said that it should solve the low volume problem but thats not the case So what is happening here with this specific device?